April 13,
1962, release date
Directed
by Blake Edwards
Screenplay
by the Gordons (Mildred Gordon, Gordon Gordon)
Based on Operation
Terror by Mildred Gordon, Gordon Gordon
Music by
Henry Mancini
Edited by
Patrick McCormack
Cinematography
by Philip H. Lathrop
Lee Remick as Kelly Sherwood
Stefanie Powers as Toby Sherwood
Ross Martin as Garland Humphrey
“Red” Lynch
Roy Poole as Owen Bradley
Patricia Huston as Nancy Ashton
Ned Glass as Jim “Popcorn” Durgs
Anita Loo as Lisa Soong
Warren Hsieh as Joey Soong
Clarence Lung as Yung, Lisa’s lawyer
Clifton James as Captain Moreno
Al Avalon as the man who picks up Kelly
at the nightclub
Gilbert Green as the FBI chief
William Bryant as Chuck, FBI agent
Dick Crockett as an FBI agent
James Lanphier as Mr. Cutter, Nancy
Ashton’s landlord
Sidney Miller as the drunk
Frederic Downs as Welk
Sherry O’Neil as Edna
Mari Lynn as Penny
Harvey Evans as Dave
William Sharon as Raymond Burkhart
Don Drysdale as himself (pitcher for
the Los Angeles Dodgers)
Distributed
by Columbia Pictures
Produced
by Geoffrey-Kate Productions
Glenn Ford is one of
my favorite noir actors—one of my all-time favorite actors—and I looked forward
to seeing him in this neo-noir directed by Blake Edwards. And I wasn’t
disappointed. Experiment in Terror is a very stylish adaptation of the
novel Operation Terror by the husband-and-wife team of Gordon Gordon and
Mildred Nixon Gordon. This story of a woman attacked in her own home and
coerced into stealing money from the bank where she works is full of tension
and suspense. When the DVD I was watching cut out exactly halfway through the
film, I went to my local library to get another copy as soon as I could!
For
viewers, the tension in the story starts right away after the credits. Viewers
know nothing about Kelly Sherwood, not even her name, when she drives over the
San Francisco Bridge and the credits roll. When the credits are finished, Kelly
Sherwood pulls into her garage and turns off the motor of her Fairlane car. Her
garage door closes, and she thinks she hears something or someone in the garage
with her. She becomes more and more fearful because she hears a strange sound,
something like ragged breathing. Then a man grabs her suddenly from behind.
While he holds her by her neck, he threatens her and her sister Toby if Kelly
doesn’t agree to steal money from the bank where she works. (The film was originally released in the United Kingdom under the title The
Grip of Fear, which is also an apt title.)
The man
knows a lot about Kelly Sherwood and her sister Toby. He’s the one who reveals
Kelly’s identity and even some intimate details about her and her sister’s
schedules and habits. He threatens to assault both of them and kill them if
Kelly won’t steal $100,000. He threatens to kill Kelly immediately if she calls
the police. Once he leaves Kelly in the garage, she enters her house and makes
the phone call to the FBI anyway.
John
Ripley is the FBI agent who answers Sherwood’s call, but the man is still in
the Sherwood home and attacks Sherwood. He gives her only this one chance: If
she calls again, he’ll kill her. But Ripley knows that the phone call was ended
abruptly, and he and other agents in the FBI office start calling Sherwoods
listed in the local phone directories (the film was made when phone directories
were still printed and distributed to telephone company customers). One of the
agents finds the right Sherwood, but Kelly is hesitant about talking; she doesn’t
want the intruder to know that agents at the FBI office called her back. Kelly
Sherwood is resourceful, however; she pretends to talk to someone who has lost
a lighter so she can give out details about her workplace as a meeting place, a
sort of lost and found where someone could retrieve a lost item. Ripley puts
surveillance details on Sherwood’s house and on the bank where she works.
(This
blog post about Experiment in Terror contains spoilers.)
Nancy
Ashton comes to the FBI office to talk to an agent about a friend in serious
trouble, and she is assigned to Ripley. She leaves without giving many details,
but she calls the FBI office again and asks Ripley to come to her home to talk
about the criminal trouble her friend is in. Another FBI agent, Owen Bradley,
accompanies Ripley to Ashton’s apartment, but when they arrive, they find Ashton
dead. Soon, the apartment is swarming with investigators, and an FBI agent
finds a piece of paper with Sherwood’s name and address on it in Nancy Ashton’s
purse. It appears that the cases are connected.
Experiment
in Terror comes
with some twists, and some of them lead nowhere, which is probably very
realistic and the most common experience of any law enforcement officer. For
example, the man threatening Kelly Sherwood leaves a note in her sister’s bag
when the sister, Toby, is at a swimming pool with her boyfriend. He wants to
scare both Kelly and Toby, and the move is effective because the note asks
Kelly to meet him alone at the Roaring Twenties nightclub. She decides to meet
him, and she leaves the nightclub with a man, a stranger, that she thinks is an
accomplice. It turns out that he thinks Sherwood is a prostitute, and the whole
incident provides nothing about the identity of the would-be bank robber or any
clues about his plans.
The FBI tracks down enough information
about the man to know that he is Garland Humphrey “Red” Lynch and already has a
lengthy criminal record. He likes Asian women, and one of them is Lisa Soong,
but she seems to be another lead that goes nowhere. Ripley and Bradley track
her down and interview her. She says that she doesn’t know Red Lynch. When they
press her, she says that she wants to talk to her lawyer before she’ll talk any
more to Ripley and Bradley. Once the lawyer shows up and offers his advice,
Lisa Soong admits that she does know Red Lynch, but she hasn’t seen him
recently and doesn’t know where he lives.
Ripley and Bradley find it hard to
believe that Soong has seen Lynch only a few times since they met two years ago,
so they decide to put her under surveillance. They follow Soong to the Kaiser
Foundation Hospital, where she visits her six-year-old son Joey. Ripley talks
to the boy about what he knows about Lynch, but it isn’t much. Ripley then
confronts Soong, who doesn’t believe Ripley when he tells her that Lynch is a
rapist and a murderer. Lynch has been very good to her and her son: He pays for
Joey’s costly medical bills. The film spends a lot of time examining this plot
point, but viewers never learn why Lisa Soong is such an important part of the
investigation. Perhaps the uncertainty is meant to add to the unease, but I
still wanted to know more Soong’s connection to the case.
If I have
any complaint at all about Experiment with Terror, it’s the length: I
wish the film had been a little bit shorter. I found myself wishing some of the
later scenes had been faster paced. They were a little too drawn out and didn’t
always keep up the suspense of the first half of the film. The director chose
to linger on some shots and on some scenes, seemingly to draw out the tension,
but I just didn’t think it worked in the last half of the film. I was craving
progress in the story and more detail, not shots that lingered.
The film is based on the novel Operation
Terror, which I read after seeing the film. I thought it would fill in some
of the gaps presented in the film. For instance, in the film adaptation, Nancy
Ashton’s connection to Garland Lynch and to Kelly Sherwood is never made clear;
Agent Ripley offers a guess that Ashton probably found herself in a position
similar to Kelly Sherwood’s, but nothing more is said about her once she has
been found murdered. Lisa Soong’s connection to Lynch seems to be based solely
on the fact that he has a predilection for Asian women, but that doesn’t
explain his willingness to pay for her son’s numerous and expensive medical
bills. The film never offers a motive for Lynch’s victimization of women in
general, although maybe that, too, is the point: Evil doesn’t always have an
explanation. (I’ll have to write more about the novel Operation Terror in
a future blog post.)
No comments:
Post a Comment