Showing posts with label Isabelle Huppert. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Isabelle Huppert. Show all posts

Saturday, April 29, 2023

The Bedroom Window (1987)

The first time that I saw The Bedroom Window, I had a hard time believing Steve Guttenberg in the role of Terry Lambert. Guttenberg has such boyish charm and such a wide grin, too wide and too boyish, I thought, for noir. But the second time that I saw the film, I realized that he was actually perfect for the part: the naïve guy who falls for the seductive charms of an older married woman and would do anything to protect her; someone who is comfortable in the role of the gallant knight in shining armor; someone who is on his own when the married woman, Sylvia Wentworth, turns into a femme fatale the minute Terry needs her and asks for her help.

The film is a fairly close adaptation of the novel The Witnesses, by Anne Holden. The differences between the film and the novel seem major when they are listed on paper (or on screen, as it were), but the screenwriter did a good job updating the film and transferring the setting to Baltimore, Maryland. I have already written about Holden’s novel, and you can click here to see my article about it, where I discuss some of the differences.

The Bedroom Window opens with a close-up of the statue of George Washington atop the Washington Monument in the Mount Vernon–Belvedere neighborhood in Baltimore, where the film takes place. I noticed the statue’s sightless eyes, which is very unsettling and perhaps an obvious metaphor. The camera pans down to a car arriving on one of the neighborhood streets at night. The driver backs into a space at the end of a one-way street, something that appears to be a well-rehearsed habit. The driver, a man, gets out of the car and walks down the street to an apartment building. Once inside the building and in his own apartment, he gathers clothes and throws them into a closet. When he glances out his bedroom window, he sees a woman, Sylvia Wentworth, arriving at the front door of the building. At that precise moment, she is in the same spot in which a woman, Denise Connelly will be attacked much later that night. But for now, she is simply a married woman arriving to start a new affair with Terry Lambert.

Sylvia gets up in the middle of the night and witnesses the attack on the woman from Terry’s window. She also gets a clear view of the assailant. By the time that Terry arrives at the window, the assailant is gone, and both of them see the woman being helped by other neighbors. Terry says something about the woman being all right after all. She isn’t, though: She is bloody and battered and needs help walking away after the attack. Terry walks Sylvia out to her car because she wonders out loud at one point what would have happened if she had been the one outside at the wrong time. After she gets into her car, Terry asks her, “Any regrets?” “Not one,” she replies. “In spite of what happened. Maybe because of it. It’s the most exciting night I can remember. You?” Terry states, “Regrets? Are you kidding?”

Both Terry and Sylvia seem rather cavalier about the attack outside Terry’s window. And so is Collin Wentworth, Terry’s boss and Sylvia’s husband. Terry Lambert works at Wentworth Development Corporation (WDC), run by Collin. The morning after the attack, Collin Wentworth calls Terry into his office, and Collin is holding a gun that supposedly belonged to Bugsy Siegel. Collin makes a point of mentioning that he recently purchased the gun, it is forty years old, and it has never been registered. Is Terry to interpret Collin’s statements as threatening? They make him nervous. Later in the narrative, Collin finds out about Terry’s involvement in the police investigation of Denise Connelly’s assault because detectives show up at the WDC offices to question him. Collin calls Terry Lambert’s experience “interesting.”

Terry notices a newspaper article on Collin’s desk about a coed who was killed a few blocks from Terry’s apartment the same night of the attack that Sylvia witnessed. He squirrels away the newspaper article without telling Collin why he wants to read it. When Sylvia learns of this second and fatal attack, she tells Terry that she would like to do the right thing and report what she has seen, but then she would have to admit that she was in Terry Lambert’s apartment. Terry decides to act as a witness instead, to help Sylvia hide her role in the affair, and calls the police. Terry’s decision sets in motion a sequence of events that quickly snowball. Police detectives contact him to find out what he knows, and he eventually is cajoled into being a witness for the trial of someone named Chris Henderson.

(This article about The Bedroom Window contains spoilers.)

Before Terry becomes a witness in the Henderson assault trial, he goes to the police station for what he thinks is another interview by detectives. While waiting, he sits next to the victim of the attack, Denise Connelly, one of his neighbors. He doesn’t recognize her, even a little bit. When the detectives come out to talk to him, they tell him that they want him to try to identify the assailant in a lineup. He is alarmed about this development in the investigation because he never saw the attack or the assailant and barely got a good look at the victim, which she realizes when she meets him in the waiting room at the police station.

Terry Lambert cannot identify Chris Henderson in the lineup, but he is alarmed enough about the increasing police interest in him and the turn of events to start his own investigation by tailing the man he thinks is the attacker after he sees him leaving the police station. Terry eventually becomes a suspect after his spectacular failure as a witness at Chris Henderson’s trial for the assault on Denise Connelly. The detectives become even more suspicious of him after they interview his neighbors about his comings and goings on the night of the attack. Terry still won’t admit to the affair with Sylvia Wentworth and thus lies about why he left his apartment that night. He asks Sylvia for help, only to discover that she has told her husband about the affair and has no reason now to help Terry.

With no one to help him, Terry turns to Denise Connelly, the victim of Chris Henderson’s assault and attempted murder. He is a little mystified about her reasons for trusting him, and he asks her about this directly. She tells Terry that she trusted him when they first met at the police station waiting to see the lineup.

• Terry: “Tell me something. Even when you knew I was lying, you didn’t suspect me like the police. Why?”

• Denise: “I knew something the police didn’t. Remember the first time we met? The lineup?”

• Terry: “How could I forget?”

• Denise: “I knew something was wrong even then. It was obvious you’d never seen me before from your bedroom window or anyplace else. And you were completely indifferent to what you did see. Not flattering, perhaps, but upon reflection, trustworthy . . .”

Denise trusts Terry enough to join him in an investigation of their own. I have to admit that this part of the story seems a little far-fetched, but Terry’s and Denise’s joint investigation increases the tension and makes for several nail-biting sequences that were never part of the novel. I found it hard to sit still, even on second viewing when I knew what was going to happen! Their joint investigation works on the suspense level.

Steven Guttenberg is a surprise in the role of Terry Lambert. I wasn’t convinced at first, as I said, but a second viewing changed my mind on that point. Part of the reason that it works, however, is because of Isabelle Huppert’s performance as Sylvia Wentworth. She can go from beguiling to treacherous when it suits the needs of the role, and she makes it easy to see why Terry Lambert would fall for her in the first place. Huppert is a force to be reckoned with whenever she is on-screen, and The Bedroom Window is a perfect showcase for her abilities to take command and then let go without any trace of guilt or remorse: a femme fatale par excellence.

When Terry Lambert asked Sylvia if she had any regrets about their affair, he really should have paid attention when she told him, “Not one.”

January 16, 1987, release date  •  Directed by Curtis Hanson  •  Screenplay by Curtis Hanson  •  Based on the novel The Witnesses by Anne Holden  •  Music by Michael Shrieve, Patrick Gleeson  •  Edited by Scott Conrad  •  Cinematography by Gilbert Taylor

Steve Guttenberg as Terry Lambert  •  Elizabeth McGovern as Denise Connelly  •  Isabelle Huppert as Sylvia Wentworth  •  Paul Shenar as Collin Wentworth  •  Carl Lumbly as Detective Quirke  •  Frederick Coffin as Detective Jessup  •  Brad Greenquist as Chris Henderson  •  Wallace Shawn as Henderson’s defense attorney  •  Robert Schenkkan as State Attorney Peters  •  Francis V. Guinan Jr. as Peter, the bartender at Edgar’s  •  J. Michael Hunter as the pool player at Edgar’s  •  Sara Carlson as the dancer  •  Mark Margolis as the man in the phone booth  •  Jodi Long as the cocktail waitress  •  Richard K. Olsen as the late-night shopper  •  Leon Rippy as the bartender  •  Kate McGregor-Stewart as Terry’s neighbor  •  Maury Chaykin as the pool player

Distributed by StudioCanal, Lionsgate Films  •  Produced by De Laurentiis Entertainment Group

Sunday, August 25, 2019

Merci pour le chocolat (2000)

October 25, 2000, release date
Directed by Claude Chabrol
Screenplay by Claude Chabrol and Caroline Eliacheff
Based on the novel The Chocolate Cobweb by Charlotte Armstrong
Music by Matthieu Chabrol
Edited by Monique Fardoulis
Cinematography by Renato Berta

Isabelle Huppert as Marie-Claire Muller (aka Mika)
Jacques Dutronc as André Polonski
Anna Mouglalis as Jeanne Pollet
Rodolphe Pauly as Guillaume Polonski
Brigitte Catillon as Louise Pollet
Michel Robin as Patou Dufreigne
Mathieu Simonet as Axel
Lydia Andrei as Lisbeth
Véronique Alain as Madame le Maire
Isolde Barth as Pauline
Sibylle Blanc as Nathalie

Distributed by MK2 Diffusion
Produced by MK2 Productions, CAB Productions, France 2 Cinema, Television Suisse Romande, YMC Productions

“A tendency to desire evil, often with a certain pleasure.”
—Definition of the word perversity according to the Petit Larousse.

Isabelle Huppert is the star of Merci pour le chocolat in every way imaginable. She carries the film, with its focus on the perversity of her character Marie-Claire Muller, who goes by the nickname Mika. Marie-Claire has most of the other characters fooled—but not the viewers. We are given the same hints that another character, Jeanne Pollet, sees. Although Jeanne’s perspective provides glimpses into Marie-Claire’s character, and Marie-Claire doesn’t appear in every scene, the film belongs to Marie-Claire and thus to Isabelle Huppert.

The film is based on Charlotte Armstrong’s The Chocolate Cobweb. The story is updated for the period in which the film was made (it was released in October 2000), but Merci pour le chocolat is a remarkably close adaptation of Armstrong’s novel, which was published in 1948. The director Claude Chabrol pays homage to the source material by incorporating Marie-Claire’s crocheting project: a large afghan in the shape of a cobweb! The yarn is even a chocolate-brown color.

For more information, click on each name listed below:

Merci pour le chocolat opens with only a few credits—four short lists—and then a marriage ceremony: André Polonksy and Marie-Claire Muller are marrying each other for the second time. Various snippets of conversation among the guests at the wedding reception provide some odd observations that put viewers a bit on edge, for example:
◊ Patou Dufreigne, the manager of the Muller Chocolate factory, which Marie-Claire owns, says of André: “I admire him as a pianist but, as a man, he bothers me.”
◊ Dufreigne tells the same group of wedding guests, “A low-key wedding is better this time” and “The first one was so luxurious. There were 500 guests. And look where it got them.”
◊ The woman who officiated at the wedding ceremony tells Marie-Claire, “I know you like my own daughter.” Marie-Claire responds, “Personne me faite, ma chérie” (translated as “I’m no one’s daughter”).
Even when others are speaking or starting their lines of dialogue, the camera focuses on Marie-Claire. It’s almost as if she is listening to each conversation, but the way that she is photographed, viewers know that this is impossible.

The remaining credits appear over shots of a ferry crossing a rather large body of water. The ferry slips toward a dock, and the camera pans down to two women seated at a restaurant table across the street from the dock. The women are waiting for other people, Axel and Jeanne. When Axel and Jeanne arrive, the four order meals. Then the film cuts to them on the restaurant’s outdoor patio, where they drink coffee and have dessert. From their conversations, viewers ascertain that Axel and Jeanne are the children of the two women, but nothing is said directly about the relationships between the characters. Axel asks Jeanne if she would like to see a movie, and his mother produces a newspaper. While searching for theater listings, she finds Marie-Claire Muller’s and André Polonski’s wedding portrait and wedding announcement, both of which bring up a rather odd familial secret.

The connection between the Polonskis and the Pollets is explained by Axel’s mother, who knows the secret, to Jeanne, who is instantly curious about this story that she has never heard before. When Jeanne was born, there had been a mix-up at the hospital. It seems André Polonski thought Jeanne was his daughter, when his wife had actually given birth to his son, Guillaume. The hospital had run out of baby bracelets and used the first three letters of the families’ names (P-O-L) to identify each newborn. A nurse showed the wrong baby to André, and Jeanne’s father had to straighten out the facts.

Jeanne, still curious about this bit of family lore, decides to visit the Polonski home, where she introduces herself as the Polonski daughter that almost was. She shares her musical talent with André: Both play the piano. Jeanne is not above using her newfound knowledge about the name mix-up to insinuate herself into André’s good graces, and she is more than happy to return to the Polonski home to take up André’s offer of some piano coaching.

But Jeanne is not so smitten with her good fortune that she ignores some warning signs. While studying a framed portrait of Lisbeth Polonski, André’s deceased wife and his son Guillaume’s mother, she sees Marie-Claire purposely spill some chocolate that she had prepared for Guillaume. Jeanne is suspicious, so she asks her boyfriend Axel to test the chocolate residue on her sweater. (She had accidently stained the sweater helping Marie-Claire with the cleanup.) Axel is a lab assistant at Louise Pollet’s criminal laboratory, and he finds that the chocolate stain contains residues of Rohypnol, a benzodiazepine.

(This blog post about Merci pour le chocolat contains spoilers.)

Jeanne warns Guillaume, who refuses to believe her at first. He calls her crazy and tells her that she is out of her mind. He is annoyed because Jeanne imitates his mother’s poses in the photographs around his home, and he doesn’t appreciate the way Jeanne fawns over his father by imitating André’s piano technique. But as Jeanne and Guillaume continue to talk, he begins to describe the circumstances of his mother death. As a result of that conversation, he begins to wonder if there is something to Jeanne’s story and to her suspicions about Lisbeth Polonski’s death. Now both become wary of Marie-Claire—and with good reason.

This post started with a definition of the word perversity, which is actually a quotation from a featurette on the DVD that I watched called “Introduction by Claude Chabrol.” The featurette is a short text essay, and its discussion of the word perversity sums up the character of Marie-Claire, although her name is never mentioned in the feature. Marie-Claire and her husband André share a conversation that reveals her perversity to her husband; viewers, on the other hand, already knew that she was capable of inflicting harm:
• Marie-Claire: “I have a knack for doing wrong.” [Film cuts to Jeanne and Guillaume in the car, with Jeanne driving. They hit a wall and the screen goes black.] “It’s wrong when I pervert good. The more violent it is, the more it appears good. I give, I give, I give, and I can never ask. I didn’t even ask to live.”
• André: “You received life like everyone else. You can’t deny that.”
• Marie-Claire: “I don’t understand. I never understand when you speak. I know what I am. I’m nothing. So . . . .”
• André: “What have you done to them? Tell me what you’ve done. You know how I cherish Guillaume.”
• Marie-Claire: “You should tell him. Guillaume’s like me and we’re not like you. My mother never thought I was a genius. I’m just a hanger-on.”
• André: “You don’t realize how much you’ve helped me. Thanks to you, I . . .”
• Marie-Claire: “I know, I help everyone. I helped Lisbeth too.”
• André: “But you adored Lisbeth . . .”
• Marie-Claire: “I let her do what she wanted. I only put Rohypnol in her cognac.”
• André: “Why did you do it? You loved her . . .”
• Marie-Claire: “That makes no difference. Instead of loving, I say, ‘I love you,’ and people believe me. I have real power in my mind. I calculate everything. It’s in God’s hands. I think I need to feel tired occasionally. You understand? Why am I telling you all this?”
• André: “What have you done to them?”
• Marie-Claire: “To whom?”
• André: “The children.”
• Marie-Claire: “Nothing. Why would I do anything to them? I put Rohypnol in the coffee. Are you angry?”
• André: “What a question!”
• Marie-Claire: “Are you angry?”
• André: “You fool everyone.”
• Marie-Claire: “Some people fool themselves.
The way that Marie-Claire talks with her husband about his son Guillaume and Jeanne, who he has been coaching, is chilling. And yet she has two lines that stand out for their lucidity. When André says that he cherishes Guillaume, Marie-Claire responds, “You should tell him,” which makes perfect sense because André devotes so much of his time and energy to his music. When André tells Marie-Claire that she has fooled everyone, she seems to imply that it was easy and that she really did nothing when she says, “Some people fool themselves.”

The first time that I saw Merci pour le chocolat, I was confused by the opening sequences, which made it hard for me to follow the plot and identify the relationships between all the characters. The opening wedding sequence ends with the woman who officiated at the marriage ceremony asking Marie-Claire about taking a photograph of the newlywed couple: “Sorry, I have a favor to ask. For the press . . . A photo. Just one little photo.” When the film cuts to Louise Pollet at the restaurant with her friend, the connection between them and Polonskis isn’t introduced right away. Louise Pollet and her friend sit at the restaurant waiting for other people, but viewers have to infer from the conversation that the two people are their children. And the newspaper story about Marie-Claire Muller’s and André Polonski’s wedding, accompanied by the wedding photo, comes rather late in the sequence, when Axel’s mother finally explains to Jeanne the story about André Polonski thinking that Jeanne instead of Guillaume was his child.

After my first viewing, I read Charlotte Armstrong’s book, which helped me follow the plot of the film more easily when I saw it a second time. The story is updated to 1999 and 2000, when the film was made and released, respectively, but Merci pour le chocolat is a remarkably close adaptation of Armstrong’s novel. Whether or not you read the novel, Merci pour le chocolat is one of those films where it really helps to pay attention to every detail. And Isabelle Huppert is superb in the role of Marie-Claire. The perversity of the character is unsettling, and Huppert doesn’t shy away from showing Marie-Claire’s complexity. The setting and the family seem ordinary on the surface, but Huppert’s performance allows us to see all the cracks.

My blog post about Merci pour le chocolat is my entry for the Vive la France! Blogathon. Click here for the complete list of participants and links to their entries. The blogathon is hosted by Lady Eve at Lady Eve’s Reel Life and Christian Esquevin at Silver Screen Modes. Click on each blog title to visit their respective blogs.