Directed
by Joseph Losey
Screenplay
by Dalton Trumbo, Hugo Butler
Based on
a story by Robert Thoeren, Hans Wilhelm
Music by
Lyn Murray
Edited by
Paul Weatherwax
Cinematography
by Arthur C. Miller
Van Heflin as Webb Garwood
Evelyn Keyes as Susan Gilvray
John Maxwell as Bud Crocker
Katherine Warren as Grace Crocker
Emerson Treacy as William Gilvray
Madge Blake as Martha Gilvray
Wheaton Chambers as Dr. William
James
Robert Osterloh as the coroner
Louise Lorimer as the motel manager
Sherry Hall as John Gilvray
Dalton Trumbo as the radio voice of
John Gilvray (uncredited)
This blog
post about The Prowler is my entry
for the Classic Movie Blog Association’s 2018 Fall Blogathon: Outlaws.
The
Prowler is a very unsettling
film, and that very characteristic, one of many, makes it thoroughly noir. The
film opens with a woman, Susan Gilvray, dressed in a towel and standing in her
bathroom. Susan suddenly notices someone looking in her window and pulls down
her shade in alarm. The camera (and thus the viewers) are outside her window
looking in, so viewers are put in the position of watching her, just like the
prowler who is outside her window. Viewers never see this person, which adds
ambiguity to the film and puts a question mark on Susan’s reliability: Did she
see a prowler or not?
The credits appear
over the window shade that Susan just pulled down. After the credits, two
police officers, Webb Garwood and his partner Bud Crocker, arrive to
investigate Susan’s report of the prowler outside her bathroom window. Neither
officer seems to take her very seriously, which probably won’t come as much of
a surprise to many viewers. It’s a common enough reaction today, and I’m sure
it was even more common in the 1950s. Here’s the conversation that opens the
film, with Susan Gilvray showing Officer Crocker where she was standing in the
bathroom when she saw the prowler:
• Bud Crocker: “Well, if I was you, from now on,
I’d keep the curtain closed. You ever notice in a bank, they always keep the
counting room out of sight so the customers won’t be tempted.”
• Susan Gilvray: “I suppose you’re right. I just
didn’t think . . . [startled by Webb] Oh, it’s you.”
• Webb Garwood: [outside the bathroom window
smirking and looking in] “No footprints out here. The grass has just been cut,
and they’d be kind of hard to spot. Then again, maybe the lady’s just imagining
things.”
The
audience can see Officer Webb Garwood’s face plainly through the bathroom
window, which is presumably the same view Susan had of the prowler. The film
cuts to a shot of Officer Webb Garwood outside making his way from the bathroom
window to the Gilvrays’ front door, which opens to reveal Officer Bud Crocker
and Susan Gilvray. Officer Garwood steps over the threshold to join their
conversation.
• Susan Gilvray: “I’m sorry to have caused you
all this trouble, but I do get nervous at night, and—”
• Bud Crocker: “That’s our job, ma’am. You always
alone at night?”
• Susan Gilvray: “Yes. The maid comes in
daytimes, but she leaves right after dinner.”
• Bud Crocker: “Well, from now on, be sure and
pull the shades and lock the door.” [steps outside the front door]
• Susan Gilvray: “I will.”
• Webb Garwood: [steps outside the front door and
turns his back to the camera] “Think you’ll feel comfortable enough for us to
leave now?”
• Susan Gilvray: “Oh, yes, I’m perfectly all
right now.”
The creepiness really
begins when Officer Webb Garwood decides Susan Gilvray is rich enough to do him
some good, and he returns to her home one night under the pretense that he is
simply following up for her own safety. Once Susan Gilvray allows Officer
Garwood into her home, he begins to insinuate himself into her life with the
idea of manipulating her into a relationship with him. Susan Gilvray is a woman
trapped in an unhappy marriage, and she is vulnerable to Webb Garwood’s
advances.
I couldn’t help
wondering what Susan sees in Webb, and this might be a big stumbling block to
the believability of the narrative. Susan strikes me as an intelligent woman,
but perhaps her options were much more limited in 1951 precisely because she is
a woman. (I cannot help wondering how this story would be remade in the wake of
the Me Too movement.) She
is drawn in deeper and deeper by slow degrees, and that approach might help a
lot of viewers accept Susan’s actions. I had a tough time believing that Susan
would be swayed by all of Webb’s plans and schemes. Webb is a master
manipulator, however, and he works hard to get what he wants. Webb Garwood is
what makes the story so creepy. That part was definitely believable.
You may be asking
yourself, “But how does The Prowler
fit the outlaw theme of this blogathon?” And it’s a good question because you
might also be thinking, from all I’ve described so far, that nothing about the
film seems to be about outlaws.
(This blog post about
The Prowler contains spoilers.)
Most of the
characters are not outlaws, but Officer Webb Garwood turns into one over the
course of the film. All his scheming and plotting puts him outside the law that
he is supposed to uphold. He may start the film in a patrol officer’s uniform,
but he doesn’t end the film in the same role or wearing the same clothes. He
literally leaves it all behind and heads for an abandoned mining town so that
he can cover up any circumstantial evidence that points to his role in the
death of his wife Susan’s first husband. He takes Susan, who is now pregnant, to
the mining town with him after convincing her that he has enough experience as
a police officer that he can deliver their child without any outside medical
help!
If Webb Garwood has
his way, the whole family will be living in isolation, outside society and
outside the law. Garwood and his pregnant wife do head for the abandoned town:
He convinces Susan that she can live an outlaw life with him. But Webb doesn’t
get his way in the end, partly because he cannot keep convincing Susan that he
has her best interests at heart and that all of his plans will work out. She
realizes that living like an outlaw with a baby and with a husband who cannot
be trusted is no way to live.
Webb refuses to give
in: He would rather stay on the run. In very noir fashion, he dies a fugitive
from the law—an outlaw. He may not fit the conventional definition, but Webb
Garwood is an outlaw, one with a very creepy twist.
Garwood didn't have far to go in his descent to an outlaw. A very disturbing character and great performances from both out leads.
ReplyDeleteVan Heflin and Evelyn Keyes are two of my noir favorites.
DeleteI know exactly why Susan fell for Webb--it was Van Heflin!! LOL, you know I'm a bit biased. You're right, though, he was amazingly creepy, just the opposite of his supporting turn in SHANE. Quite the range. I thought he and Evelyn Keyes were well-matched on many levels.
ReplyDeleteI think this was a fine choice for the Blogathon, and I look forward to reading your next piece about this film.
Thank you, Jocelyn. Van Heflin and Evelyn Keyes are two good reasons to see any movie; together, they are noir-perfection!
DeleteHmmm.... you make it sound so creepy, yet so alluring.... loved you post. I will put this on my "must see" list when I am strong enough!
ReplyDeleteThanks! I saw The Prowler on DVD, and the DVD features made the film all the more alluring, as you say! In fact, they will be the subject of my second post about this film.
DeleteSuch a fan of Heflin's, but I haven't seen this one yet. The casual dismissal and condescending looks of the officers alone make me feel for the heroine. I can't wait to see him in such a creepy role.
ReplyDeleteI'm a big fan of Heflin. I hope that you enjoy this film.
DeleteThis movie absolutely gave me the creeps! Thank you, Joseph Losey, the writers, and Van Heflin, especially Van Heflin, for that. He is entirely believable - and unnerving - as a disturbed man. I completely agree that he is an outlaw...The Prowler was a great choice for the Outlaws blogathon.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad that you enjoyed (is that the right word?!) it. I think one watches The Prowler with a mixture of horror and fascination! Van Heflin and Evelyn Keyes are great in the lead roles.
ReplyDelete