October
21, 2005, release date
Directed
by Nick Willing
Screenplay
by David Kane
Based on
the novel The River King by Alice
Hoffman
Music by
Simon Boswell
Edited by
Jon Gregory
Cinematography
by Paul Sarossy
Jennifer
Ehle as Betsy Chase
Thomas
Gibson as August “Gus” Pierce
Rachel
Lefèvre as Carlin Leander
John
Kapelos as Joey Tosh
David
Christoffel as Matt Farris
Jamie
Thomas King as Harry McKenna
Julian
Rhind-Tutt as Eric Herman
Jonathan
Malen as Nathaniel (“Nate”) Glass
Sean
McCann as Ernest Grey
Distributed
by Kismet Film Company
Produced
by imX Communications, River King Productions, Spice Factory Productions
Are you thinking that
you never heard of The River King? I
thought the same thing the first time I learned that Alice Hoffman’s novel was
the basis of this film starring Edward Burns. It is a Canadian and United Kingdom production that
apparently was never released to theaters in the United States. Instead it went
straight to DVD.
Alice Hoffman is one
of my favorite writers, although I have not read The River King. I fell in love with another of her novels, Turtle Moon, the first time I read it. Turtle Moon won the Hammett Prize for
crime writing in 1992. I always say that I am not very fond of categories, but
I just couldn’t imagine why Turtle Moon
would be put in the category of crime writing, even though it has a murder
investigation and plenty of mystery. I guess I should really ask myself why I
keep insisting on seeing it mostly as a love story. But learning that Turtle Moon won the Hammett prize and
that The River King was also about a
murder investigation prompted me to see the film. (Ed Burns in the starring
role of Abe Grey also figured into my decision, I must confess.)
The Hammett Prize is
awarded annually by the International Association of Crime Writers, North
American Branch (IACW/NA). Click here to learn more from
Wikipedia about the Hammett Prize and past winners.
The film is based on
Hoffman’s novel of the same name. The body of a student from the local private
school, the Haddan School, is found frozen in the river, and Officer Abe Grey
and his partner Joey Tosh are given the task of investigating the circumstances
of the boy’s death. Some people at the school and in the police department
assume that the student, Gus Pierce, killed himself because he had trouble
fitting in, but Abe becomes suspicious because he and Joey find a mysterious
red substance (which may or may not be blood) under the boy’s shirt. Abe’s
investigation of Gus’s death parallels his decision to confront the
circumstances of his brother’s death many years ago. In both instances, he has
to learn to face the truth.
(This blog post about
The River King contains spoilers.)
I was really
disappointed the first time that I saw The
River King on DVD. Here are some of the questions that I thought the film
didn’t answer satisfactorily:
◊ What was the significance of the dripping water
on the pan in Abe’s kitchen sink (the noise he hears in a dream one night) and
the clicking of a metal pull tab of the shade against the train window when Abe
is riding on the train?
◊ What is the significance of the train that Abe
is riding late in the film? Viewers see the view out the back of a moving train
at the start of the film and again near the end, but what is the significance
of these shots? What do they mean for Abe?
◊ How does this view out of the train tie in with
Abe remembering what happened to his brother Frank?
I decided
to see the film a second time; I thought maybe I could patch together some
answers to my questions. A second viewing was a good decision. I discovered
that I missed several important details and that the film is actually a bit
more complicated than I originally thought. Most of the answers are in the
narrative. On my initial
viewing, I had trouble making sense of the plot, but not because the plot was
full of holes. Details
were much easier to spot on a second viewing.
Behind the opening
credits and music, music that is both somber and unnerving, The River King starts with several shots
of seemingly random and unconnected items. Here are some examples:
◊
Out-of-focus reflections on
water
◊ Time lapse photography of sun, snow, and woods
◊ A group of boys or teenagers meeting at night
in the woods
◊ Two young boys running through snowy woods
◊ A cube decorated with Chinese characters (the
red and gold Chinese box)
◊ Shot out the rear of a moving train showing a
winter landscape
◊ Photo of team/girls in bathing suits (a school
swim team?)
◊ Abe Grey driving along a road flanked by
snowbanks
◊ The two young boys now carrying hockey sticks
and running through the woods
After my
second viewing, I could see that these shots and the focus on the various items
are explained later in the film.
A second viewing also
allowed me to appreciate other fine details about the narrative and the film. I
realized that conversations
in the present continue as voice-overs leading into the past, into flashbacks.
The technique works really well, but viewers have to pay close attention or
risk getting confused. The way the flashbacks are handled
leaves Abe and viewers wondering about their significance in the present, and
only slowly is their significance in the past revealed—both to viewers and to
Abe. Abe keeps seeing flashbacks
from his own childhood, his own memories of a traumatic event. For example,
during his initial inquiry into Gus Pierce’s death on the campus of the Haddan
School, Abe follows a young boy into a bathroom at Chalk House, where Gus
Pierce lived; it’s where Gus is dunked in a toilet by fellow students sometime
before he died. Viewers see Abe in the same bathroom, and they hear the louder
and louder dripping of water, but does Abe hear the dripping, too? And does it
really matter whether he does or not? Probably not, but I certainly wondered
about it the first time that I saw the film. Viewers learn later that the young
boy is an image from Abe’s past. It’s one of the examples of Abe and viewers
being led into the past without any obvious transition or cut.
Abe’s insistence on pursuing his
line of investigation into Gus Pierce’s death leads to him resigning from the
police department. What he gains from continuing his investigation is on a
personal level because the similarities between the circumstances of Gus’s
death and his brother’s death years ago force him to come to terms finally with
his past. This plot thread is brought to a conclusion, but viewers must pay
careful attention throughout the film because many interconnected details are
important.
To my
credit, some details are emphasized
for no apparent reason. One example is the teacher Betsy Chase taking the
photograph of Gus Pierce’s bed in his room after his death. It seems to be a
link to an odd image of possibly a face in the photograph she develops later in
the film, but she seems to be the only one who sees it. One of Abe’s colleagues
in the police department examining the photo thinks Betsy Chase just made a
mistake. Another example is the tiny fish that Carlin finds in the pocket of
Gus’s overcoat, which Gus’s father gives to Carlin as a memento of her
friendship with Gus. Does Carlin see the fish as an incarnation of Gus? As
simply a connection to Gus? Maybe these points are clarified in Hoffman’s book,
but viewers of the film shouldn’t have to read the book to find answers to
their questions.
Most of
the filming was done in Canada in winter, and it could be argued that the
landscape and the weather are like characters themselves. The snow and the cold
figure prominently: snow falling; ice forming over the river, even with its
currents; snow banked deep along the streets of the town and in the woods. The
characters are dressed for the cold: Abe Grey often wears thick boots and a
fur-lined cap. The cold, the snow, and shots of quiet woods emphasize Abe’s
loneliness and his desire to come to terms with past events. They also emphasize the mood of the film, which is a story filled with
uncertainty and restrained class hostility.
No comments:
Post a Comment